I. Concerns and questions from filmmakers
A common ongoing concern of filmmakers is whether and to what extent a trademarked image may be included in a film. Questions abound in the film community about whether someone’s logo can be used in the film, what if any is the difference, if any, if it is filmed from a public place, and what about famous public buildings? Filmmaking message boards often include robust discussions about the concept of product placement and its role in independent films. In these technologically advanced days, the question of whether YouTube may be used to advertise or update progress of a film, and whether trademarks can be included in trailers uploaded to that site. You cannot take anything you want off the internet, and owners of trademarks and other intellectual property will be watching to make sure their materials are not uploaded to the internet without their permission. The items on the internet may be there with permission, though you will not be able to tell that from viewing the photograph or clip. It also may have been taken and uploaded without permission, and the uploader may have already gotten a threatening letter from a lawyer representing the material’s copyright holder. It is a rare case that programs or clips on the internet are in the public domain, and the risk of not being able to obtain insurance or distribution for your film is not worth taking the material. In addition, YouTube now has an automatic video monitoring service called “Claim Your Content” which will automatically identify copyrighted material and remove it from its site.[1] You may check back to see the clip you took from YouTube and find that it has been removed, which is a pretty good indication it was uploaded without permission. Trademark holders are especially diligent in ferreting out uses of their mark in an unfair way to bolster marketing of a film or other product, associating unrelated products with their goodwill and benefiting from their works without paying for them.